Flushing out the Fjord 2

This is a brief update to the first Flushing out the Fjord post.

It looks some more ice is being flushed out of the Illulisat fjord. Here's an animation of the past week:

Although it looks quite spectacular, this isn't as uncommon as I suspected it to be. I'm going to look some farther back when I've mustered enough courage to dive into the archives, but I did find an image dating from 2009 (coincidentally on the second day the MODIS satellite images could be viewed online, March 19th):

Not as much flushing as this year, but plenty enough to not get ahead of ourselves (maybe 'myself' would be more accurate). Up till now I thought the plug at the end of the fjord kept the ice from drifting out into Disko bay (to dance and party, I'm sure), but hey, I've only been looking at the Arctic this intensely for 10 months now. Besides, when a NASA IceBridge project scientist says it is 'something he has never seen before' I tend to take notice, you know? Bloody alarmist fearmongers. ;-)

I'll look into it some more and might get back on this, but I'd encourage everyone to give a shout if they have more info or ideas. It's one of the most interesting thing to keep an eye on, as long as the melting hasn't started for real yet.

Here's a link to Mauri Pelto's article on Jakobshavn Isbrae for some more general info, with two Landsat images at the bottom comparing this year and last year.

Comments

[Glacierchange.wordpress.com]

Neven: I added one more image to the aforementioned Jakobshavn post this is a zoomed in look at the April 2011 Landsat image of the fjord. The icebergs can be easily distinguished from the regular sea ice. What is the percentage in your estimate? Then I will share mine.

[Neven]

Thanks for that image, Mauro (where do you get those BTW). If the icebergs are the things with shade I would venture a guess of 5%?

[Daniel Bailey]

Mauri, is the banding a signal degradation issue, satellite overflight edge, or is it a visual issue inherent in the imagery?

The resolution in what can be seen is pretty decent, so it would seem a processing error/noise issue.

If it could be cleaned up then perhaps some reprocessing software could aid in better determining the ice coverage question.

Since I'm talking imagery again after all these years, any idea of the pixel ground size?

Questions, questions, questions...

The Yooper

[Glacierchange.wordpress.com]

The Landsat images are provided free at http://glovis.usgs.gov/. The problem that can exist on many is the gridlines from the distribution of image effects caused by the scan line corrector failure. It is a straight forward but not necessarily a time effective operation for browse images like this.

[Neven]

Here's a funny thought:

Could the flushing out have something to do with the extreme cold we witnessed over Greenland the past few weeks? Allow me to explain. I once translated a documentary about the katabatic winds in Antarctica. When it is extremely cold in the center of an ice sheet, the air gets so cold that it starts rolling down the hill because of gravity.

My guess is that it got so cold over the interior of the Greenland ice sheet that a katabatic wind rolled down and pushed out all the ice from the fjord. It's less cold in the interior now and the fjord seems to be filling up with thin ice again.

[Artful Dodger]

Neven, to test your theory you need to identify a Met station in the fjord and retrieve it's records. Weather underground may have the archive you need.