« Sailing through the ice | Main | Animation 14: Canadian Archipelago »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Lord Soth

If you take a close look at this sea ice; the outside area looks like multiyear ice while the inside towards the glacier is first year ice. It looks like the inside area is cracking and is going to shear along a north south line where the open water is in the center of the mass. This will send the multiyear ice adrift.

Glacierchange.wordpress.com

The Zachariae Glacier does not have a large floating section like the Petermann nor is it nearly as rapidly moving as the Jakobshavn. Thus, the impact of a late season sea ice loss that seems more limited than 2007 or 2008 is likely to be incremental if any. The northern section of the terminus that emerges from the confining outlet fjord is certainly the vulnerable part.

Neven

Mauri (nice to see you back), do you mean to imply that more or all of that landfast ice was gone in 2007 and 2008 around this time of the year? I thought most of it, especially near the coast, had been there for many, many years.

Glacierchange.wordpress.com

The MODIS imagery of the ice front area from the Byrd Polar RC indicate to me a bit less sea ice in 2007 and 2008, maybe a comparative animation of yours would allow better comparison. The Operation Ice Bridge footage is also nice of the ice bergs near the glacier. The glacier has a bedrock rise at the end of the floating tongue which is not that thick. The floating section is 10-20 km long depending upon whether you measure from the southern or northern edge of the terminus. Beyond that rise the bed extends below sea level for another 100 km inland. The glacier in the northeast that has a particularly long deep uninterrrupted low basal elevation is the Storstrømmen

Glacierchange.wordpress.com

Neven I have been working on a bit of Petermann Glacier material today. The annotations for the images identify supraglacial stream channels the spread of the rift that I labelled as Rift C in 2008 in the 2009 blog update to the 2008 RC article.

Neven

Mauri, thanks a lot for your explanation and links. I'll see if I can find images of 2007 and 2008 to compare, although I really dislike searching the MODIS database.

Neven

I had a look after all (see updates). In 2007 things look pretty solid. 2008 looks just as bad, if not worse.

Lord Soth

I was right on the money. The 79N NE Greenland sea ice has shattered down the North/South line between the first year ice close to the Glacier and the 2nd year ice that did not melt in 2009 on the outside. In two weeks it will look like 2008.

http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?subset=Arctic_r02c03.2010238.terra.250m

The comments to this entry are closed.