This hasn't anything to do with the Arctic sea ice directly, but as everything in and around the Arctic is inter-related and inter-connected, I wouldn't call the following news article a dissonance on the Arctic Sea Ice blog. Of course those fires will also probably cause some soot to fly towards the ice pack. Things are apparently even worse than in 2010.
Earth Observatory Image of the Day:
On June 18, 2012, a total of 198 wildfires burned across Russia and had charred an area that covered 8,330 hectares (32 square miles). Many were in central Russia, where firefighters have battled uncontrolled fires for months.
The latest flare-up prompted Russian authorities to declare a state of emergency in seven regions, including the Khanty-Mansiisk autonomous area, the Tyva Republic, the Sakha Republic, Krasnoyarsk, Amur, Zabaikalsky, and Sakhalin.
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite acquired these images of numerous fires and heavy smoke near the borders of Khanty-Mansiisk, Krasnoyarsk, and Tomsk at 1:20 p.m. local time (06:20 Universal Time) on June 18. Active fires are shown with red outlines. Numerous fires are burning through taiga in Krasnoyarsk (bottom), and a large pall of smoke to the south covers much of Tomsk (top).
According to Russian authorities, many of the fires started when people lost control of agricultural fires and campfires. However, lightning sparked some of the blazes as well.
According to the environmental group Greenpeace, more land in Russia has burned this year than in 2010, a year that intense wildfires affected western Russia and produced rare pyrocumulus “fire clouds.”
References
Have been cogitating about this since it appeared, thanks for posting it. You might like to take a look at the connected link (from August 2010):
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/PyroClouds/
(my html isn't up to posting an image; imho the text is fascinating.
Posted by: Susan Anderson | June 22, 2012 at 03:00
Forgot to mention Colorado fire shows one of those clouds too (EO 18 June). Getting all too common.
Though this is even further from the Arctic, here's the link on the High Park fire that mentions pyrocumulus:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=78312
And in looking it up, found Earth Observatory has stitched together an Arctic view (date May 26):
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=78312
Posted by: Susan Anderson | June 22, 2012 at 03:28
Living in Colorado and being able to see the smoke from the High Park fire I must say that I'm not too impressed with the 32 sq. miles total coverage from the Siberian fires, as the High Park fire by itself is already over 100 sq. miles, and it is only one of several burning in our state and one of dozens burning across the Western U.S.
Very high temps and wind headed back into our region this weekend with humidity in the single digits...and it's not even July yet...the start of our normal fire season.
"Not even July yet...". Isn't that what we've been saying about the Arctic sea ice?
Posted by: R. Gates | June 22, 2012 at 05:13
Not sure the size of the fires we are getting in Borneo and Sumatra at the moment (luckily we haven't had any major out breaks here in Sabah) - but this is the sort of impacts we face:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/28/sumatran-orangutans-dying-indonesia-forest-fire
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 22, 2012 at 05:38
Those smokes from the forest fires travel quite a long way so it's not necessarily so unconnected. Here's an example: http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Smoke+from+Russian+fires+covers+Helsinki+on+Monday+afternoon/1135221155495
so it's dependent of the wind direction. And the finer particles travel further, since I've also smelled those too on couple of occasions (western coast)
Posted by: Otto Lehikoinen | June 22, 2012 at 06:41