Apocalypse4Real has been sending me these images for a while now, but as I haven't found the time to do something with them yet, he has put up his own Google Website that shows images such as these:
These new sea ice concentration (top) and thickness (bottom) maps come from the GODIVA2 Data Visualisation demo page (see this explanation on how to get to the images).
As Apocalypse4Real wrote to me:
The UK data I have been tracking in Godiva2 is put out by the UK, The National Center of Ocean Forecasting (NCOF). The NCOF is a strategic partnership between the Met Office and the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton and the Environmental Systems Science Centre (ESSC) at Reading. The GODIVA2 data is output by the ESSC. See http://www.ncof.co.uk/OSTIA-Daily-Sea-Surface-Temperature-and-Sea-Ice.html
The NCOF uses the Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) data for sea surface temperature and sea ice concentration and thickness analysis. OSTIA uses satellite data provided by the GHRSST project, together with in-situ observations to determine the sea surface temperature. The analysis is performed using a variant of optimal interpolation (OI) described by Martin et al., 2007. The analysis is produced daily at a resolution of 1/20° (approx. 5km). See http://ghrsst-pp.metoffice.com/pages/latest_analysis/ostia.html
The GHRSST project, which is the source of the 5km data, is an international satellite observation project. It consolidates imagery and data from a number of hi-res platforms. See: https://www.ghrsst.org/ghrsst-science/what-is-ghrsst/
I don't know about the accuracy of these images, but they're visually stunning. This is yet again another great tool for assessing and interpreting the situation up North. Thanks go out to Apocalypse4real for starting a website to make viewing of these images easier.
Neven, hi. A friend of mine sent me these two links. He wonders what is that blue area that you can see in the Arctic ocean (I wonder about that too). Can you explain that to us?
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/?subset=Arctic_r02c05.2012220.terra
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/?mosaic=Arctic.2012220.terra.4km
Posted by: Ugo Bardi | August 10, 2012 at 19:22
Hello, Ugo, and welcome to the Arctic Sea Ice blog, the only blog that is scarier than yours. ;-)
Just kidding, there is a lot of scary stuff out there nowadays, which I refer to as the Crisis Cocktail.
That blue-green colour you see, is a very, very big algal bloom off the coast of Norway. There was one last year as well, which is now my desktop wallpaper.
Unlike the recent Arctic summer storm, nothing to worry about.
Posted by: Neven | August 10, 2012 at 19:29
I had been about to post these in the preceding thread....
Seke Rob,
That double record is in the initial table I use for lookup functions to arrange a year/day array, but doesn't have an effect with the way I'm working. Vlookup doesn't seem phased by the double date and simply copies the correct value to the rlevant year/day cell in the 2d array.
I have however noticed that sometimes recent day numbers are wrong, and are subsequently changed. i.e. I have to manually over write the wrong days and overwrite the data when they're corrected a few days later.
Steve/Twemoran,
These thickness plots must be from a model. They are fairly typical for what PIOMAS shows in the post 2010 spring volume loss behaviour of the ice pack. Prior to that year the edge of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago was a 'reserve' for older thicker ice,even through the summer, this has not been the case since spring 2010. The ice now thickens in the winter, but melts away in the summer.
Just checked using the link to OSTIA, the model seems to be referred to as FOAM and is a derivative of Mercator's ocean model with a sea ice component added.
http://www.ncof.co.uk/FOAM-System-Description.html
Posted by: Chris Reynolds | August 10, 2012 at 19:51
Chris,
Thanks for finding this, I looked for a while but didn't find these specifics.
If the web page is accurate, they migrated the model from the Louvain-le-Neuve (LIM2) model to the Los Alamos CICE sea-ice model (http://oceans11.lanl.gov/trac/CICE) in spring 2012.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 10, 2012 at 20:10
One more thing, the CICE link is different than above.
See: http://oceans11.lanl.gov/trac/CICE
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 10, 2012 at 20:20
Apocalypse,
Thanks for that.
Posted by: Chris Reynolds | August 10, 2012 at 20:45
The site has been updated from ice concentration maximum (03/18/12), then monthly through 070112.
August 9 has been added.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 10, 2012 at 21:09
Thanks Neven! Glad to hear that there is nothing to be worried about. You know, with all those mad bloggers around, trying to scare people.....
Posted by: Ugo Bardi | August 10, 2012 at 21:35
Thanks Apocalypse; The series of thickness maps shows the last remanent of the heavy multi year ice scooting around the NE tip of Greenland and melting away. Not much ice left in the Arctic, I guess Neven will have to start an Antarctic blog soon.
Posted by: r w Langford | August 10, 2012 at 21:55
If I'm starting another blog it'll be about passivehouse building and gardening. :-)
Posted by: Neven | August 10, 2012 at 22:42
These days it feels a bit like you fell asleep on Earth and woke up on Helliconia.
Posted by: AmbiValent | August 10, 2012 at 22:56
Nicely done, Apocalypse4Real. Do you plan to make Google Earth .kmz files available?
Cheers,
Lodger
Posted by: Artful Dodger | August 10, 2012 at 23:18
@Apocalypse4Real, the thickness graphics are horrifying. Do you have any sense of their accuracy? They don't seem to follow the MODIS true color images that well (hope springs eternal). Thanks, Tenney
Posted by: Alais Elena | August 11, 2012 at 02:27
It's my impression that the these GODIVA2 thickness maps show overall higher thickness than the PIOMAS thickness maps.
See for instance this comparison I made between images from GODIVA and PIOMAS around the same date (I turned GODIVA around for easier comparison).
Posted by: Neven | August 11, 2012 at 10:56
My sense is that this new map may well be showing reality, more or less. My sense is that it's pretty darned difficult to assess how thick a given area of ice is. But the PIOMAS numbers are certainly treated pretty seriously.
I note that the PIOMAS chart on the bottom-left corner of Neven's Daily Graphs page is unlike most other graphs in this field-- the bottom of the Y-axis really is ZERO. And the curve right now is pointing toward ZERO and not all that far above it.
The remaining few million km-squared of sea ice is terribly thin and fragile, and not able to influence arctic climate conditions nearly as much as the old normal. I'd say that in terms of any functional significance of arctic sea ice, we are ALREADY at a functionally seasonally ice-free arctic.
Posted by: SteveMDFP | August 11, 2012 at 18:09
It would really be interesting how exactly they come to their thickness data.
IMO something like an "ice area mass density" - map would be interesting, too. AFAIK this is thickness * concentration * volume mass density. The latter will be very hard to obtain and could for the time beeing assumed constant.
Posted by: Dominik Lenné | August 11, 2012 at 18:18
Dominik,
From buoys, satellites, and from expeditions like this mail I received from about 87,5 N:
Very varying ice conditions between 1.5 - 3.0 meter, from edge of ice (south of Fram) between 0.5 - 1.0 meter.
Posted by: Espen Olsen | August 11, 2012 at 18:35
The Cryosat-2 satellite was supposed to measure the ice thickness with a high level of precision. I was expecting to see accurate thickness maps from it but I haven't seen much data from it at all. Does anyone know more about it?
Posted by: Alan Clark | August 11, 2012 at 18:54
Alan, most of what is publicly known, is in this blog post (especially the comments).
Posted by: Neven | August 11, 2012 at 18:59
But by the time they have those sats calibrated and ready, there might be no volume to measure, or what do you guys think?
Posted by: Espen Olsen | August 11, 2012 at 19:42
I found another real-time modeling analysis product that may be of interest:
Real-time 1/12° Arctic Cap HYCOM/CICE/NCODA Nowcast/Forecast System (ACNFS)
http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/arctic.html
Sea surface height, ice concentration, ice thickness, speed and drift. No estimate on my part as to the accuracy, but it looks interesting nevertheless.
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 11, 2012 at 21:25
The thickness is off by 1 meter, Tim (the people from the Naval Research Laboratory say so themselves). It's the replacement of PIPS and is on the ASI graphs webpage, towards the bottom of the daily graphs page.
Unfortunately, I don't find the ice displacement forecast maps half as useful as the PIPS displacement maps were.
Posted by: Neven | August 11, 2012 at 21:32
I managed to produce an "effective thickness" map from the godiva (http://data.ncof.co.uk:8080/ncWMS/godiva2.html) thickness and area fraction maps with guess what? Photoshop. Download the maps as greyscale, open one in PS, create a multipication level and paste the second one in it. Then create a modification level and fiddle around with the gradation curves to get the color coding.
To be seen here: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/33/siafsithproductcolorcod.jpg/
It looks plausible but I didn't check it meticulously.
Posted by: Dominik Lenné | August 11, 2012 at 21:36
Neven wrote, "The thickness is off by 1 meter, Tim..."
Oh yes. I remember your mentioning this a while back, but I had forgotten that it was this product. A meter would seem to be significant.
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 11, 2012 at 22:29
Alan Clark wrote:
The Guardian has an article today that is largely devoted to the CryoSat-2:Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 12, 2012 at 00:04
Sorry, that link is broken, the following should work:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/aug/11/arctic-sea-ice-vanishing
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 12, 2012 at 00:07
Great find! Definitely worth a post once Neven has time :-)
If the figures they quote are right, then PIOMAS may be understating volume - but not by much. Depends what they're calling "summer" volume, and how they got to that figure of 7000 km^3 for 2012 when we're not yet at the minimum. End-August PIOMAS model said just under 6000.
Posted by: Peter Ellis | August 12, 2012 at 00:13
Thanks a lot, Timothy. I'll put this in a separate blog post tomorrow.
Posted by: Neven | August 12, 2012 at 00:16
Hmmm, weird that there is nothing on the ESA website as of yet.
Posted by: Neven | August 12, 2012 at 00:20
No problem.
The following may also be of interest:
https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/cryosat/content?p_r_p_564233524_assetIdentifier=how-to-access-cryosat-data-6842
However, it looks like the data may not be accessible at the moment:
CryoSat - PDS archive maintenance extension
10 August 2012
https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/news...
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 12, 2012 at 00:26
What the heck, blog post is up. I'm off to bed now.
Posted by: Neven | August 12, 2012 at 00:47
Lodger,
Unfortunately the Google Earth .kmz files are named the same each time they run. I save them as renamed files in my Google Earth directory, but had not considered posting.
That may be something to add.
A4R
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 12, 2012 at 03:26
Dominik,
The overlay map in interesting, can you do it for the entire CAB?
Looks like I need to acquire Photoship!
A4R
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 12, 2012 at 03:34
A4R:
ImageJ is free, and can do a lot that PS does
http://www.imagingbook.com/index.php?id=102
http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/index.html
http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/index.html
Posted by: dabize | August 12, 2012 at 03:43
Even though the data comes from CryoSat-2, the analysis is by Dr Seymour Laxon, of the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling at University College London (UCL). I'd expect to see an announcement there, or perhaps personal communication with Dr. Laxon at the website:
http://www.cpom.org/
Posted by: Artful Dodger | August 12, 2012 at 05:25
A4R
Check out Gimp as a Photoshop alternative - Free & full featured.
BTW I agree with what Lodger has posted on a few threads. What we excel at is Arctic observations - not political discussions.
Terry
Posted by: Twemoran | August 12, 2012 at 07:19
Thanks to all for suggestions and examples on how to overlay the concentration and thickness data. It is an intriguing.
If I did it, should it be called a concentration/thickness correlation map (CTC map)?
The August 11, 2012 data is up.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 12, 2012 at 21:19
Apocalypse4Real wrote:
Actually one other thought comes to mind: use three channels, e.g., red for concentration, green for thickness, and blue for correlation, or some such.I did something along those lines here with brightness in three different channels of the infrared spectrum for water vapor:
http://www.climate-guardian.com/avatar/index.php?inner_page=water#mainImage
At a given wavelength, the brighter the image the less water vapor and the more transparent the atmosphere, implying that radiation is coming from a lower, warmer altitude.
I'm cheap, so I used Gimp.
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 12, 2012 at 22:40
Neven, check your email.
Posted by: Timothy Chase | August 12, 2012 at 23:05
A4R wrote: "the Google Earth .kmz files are named the same each time they run."
It'd be great even just to be able to grab the latest daily version. It would be relatively simple to have a static link to the latest file, just upload and overwrite the previous .kmz
I'd love to see this. Right now I'd like to be able to make some shrewd guesses as to how much ice extent is still at risk for this last month of the 2012 melt season. The Google Earth "ruler|path" tool makes this pretty straight forward.
Thanks again for this excellent resource, A4R.
Cheers,
Lodger
Posted by: Artful Dodger | August 12, 2012 at 23:30
This (using Photoschop to generate an "effective thickness map") was more a proof of concept. BTW paint.net does the job as well if not better.
To do this with a complete set of images or regularly would IMO require some scripting to yield reproducible results - and save worktime. This can be achieved with Freemath - I'm working on it.
Have just discovered this marvelous program and have not fully explored its possibilities. The same map, this time made with Freemath:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/834/sieffectuvethicknessfre.png/
I am going to make the script publicly available too, when it is a bit more mature.
Posted by: Dominik Lenné | August 13, 2012 at 03:26
August 12 is up.
Artful, this is my first website, so am looking for how to post the kmz file.
Dominik, thanks for the helpful advice, downloaded Gimp, but now have to learn how to use it. I will look at the above options later today.
Off to work!
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 13, 2012 at 16:13
So, any interested person may get a working freemat script for creating effective thickness maps out of thickness and concentration maps from the godiva model (
http://data.ncof.co.uk:8080/ncWMS/godiva2.html)
from here:
https://www.box.com/s/9877a396625d87b9d03a
some example files are there too. HTH
Posted by: Dominik Lenné | August 16, 2012 at 05:46
Dominik,
Thanks for sharing your expertise in this area, it is something I do not have time to take on, but the ice effectiveness view is important to linking concentration and thickness.
A4R
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 16, 2012 at 14:27
The Godiva2 sea ice concentration and thickness maps have been updated through 17 August.
I am dividing the sea ice and methane concentration data into two websites. The new link for the sea ice data is:
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Thanks to all who have commented on this site development.
The Arctic methane data maps site is still in development, but will be released soon.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 18, 2012 at 17:05
A4R, your thickness and concentration maps are more than awesome!
Did I get it right that the resolution (pixel?) is about 5km x 5 km? This would be on the order of a third or a quarter of a "Manhattan" (and we know what a Manhattan is because of the Petermann Ice Island that is about 2 Manhattans and we've now seen a picture of some of it). If this is right, then is the Petermann Ice Island the yellow speck in the Nares Strait on both thickness and concentration maps?
Posted by: Tor Bejnar | August 18, 2012 at 17:42
I have not checked - but would presume so.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 18, 2012 at 18:47
A4R On your site [awesome] it looks like the mclure strait is set to be ice free in a few days, amongst other movements, interesting time for CA.
Posted by: johnm33 | August 18, 2012 at 18:55
Hi John,
It does seem to be melting out in place. Plenty of warmth in the area.
Mould Bay is reporting 22 C today.
Cape Parry at 18 C.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 19, 2012 at 21:30
Good evening,
The August 20 sea ice imagery is up.
A4R
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 22, 2012 at 04:22
The August 23 Godiva2 sea ice concentration and thickness maps are up.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | August 24, 2012 at 23:23
Great post. I never knew I could learn all this great information about maps on a blog! Way to go for turning me into a blog reader. If you need any advice about AHMSI rip off, check out
http://www.ahmsi3.com/
Posted by: James Fillion | August 27, 2012 at 15:32
Fricking spam! Don't click on James Fillions links.
Posted by: Seke Rob | August 27, 2012 at 15:52
The September 2 Arctic Sea Ice Thickness and Concentration maps plus kmzs are up.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 03, 2012 at 18:11
Thanks for your thickness posts A4R. As I watch things change I have to wonder if we will have any >4 meter thick ice left after this year. And whether there will be much 3 meter.
It seems that by doing some pixel-by-color counting one could generate individual melt graphs for different thicknesses.
It will be very interesting to see how thickness rebuilds during the freeze season. I suspect we will see massive extent/area losses in the Central Basin next year due to thin ice conditions at the beginning of the season.
The inner castle walls will begin to crumble....
Posted by: Bob Wallace | September 03, 2012 at 19:11
Hi Bob,
We do seem to be running low on 3+ meter ice - just the Canadian fringe hanging on as more gets blown through the Fram Strait.
What the coming freeze brings is open for much conversation. We will see in March.
BTW for those pulling their own Godiva data and maps, the Godiva2 imagery seems in transition again to another server. The link I used for Sept 2, 2012 was:
http://data.ncof.co.uk:8080/ncWMS/godiva2.html
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 03, 2012 at 20:36
September 4 Arctic Ice Concentration and Thickness are posted with kmzs.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
A4R
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 06, 2012 at 06:20
Weird that there is nothing on the ESA website as of yet.
http://www.wholesalesneakershop.com/
Posted by: Alice | September 13, 2012 at 12:00
The NCOF/Godiva2 Sept 13 sea ice concentration and thickness imagery is up.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 15, 2012 at 14:28
The NCOF/Godiva2 Sept 14 sea ice concentration and thickness imagery is up.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 16, 2012 at 04:14
The NCOF/Godiva2 Sept 15 sea ice concentration and thickness imagery is up including kmzs.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 16, 2012 at 19:02
Thanks A4R. Considering the doubts one might have about the ability for any of the monitoring equipment to show a complete and accurate picture of sea ice, it is of great use to have such user friendly sites as yours, in order for one to compare and contrast data. Looking at data from different grids, maps, animations, etc., it is clear that what little ice is out there continues to diminish and deteriorate. Seeing the visuals on your site illustrates such trends quite clearly.
Posted by: Brian | September 16, 2012 at 19:37
Hi Brian,
The ability to compare and contrast is part of my purpose.
It seems that the decline is ending. Both the Sept 16 & 17 sea ice concentration and thickness are posted and are beginning to show increases in thickness and concentration or area in some parts of the Arctic.
I have not posted the kmzs yet.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 19, 2012 at 05:37
The Godiva/NCOF maps for 18 Sept are posted and the Google Earth kmzs for 16-18 September are also added.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
My plan is to post daily through 20 Sept, and then post in 10 increments through October, then monthly thereafter until sea ice maximum, unless there is a particular interest in posting more often.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 20, 2012 at 05:10
I found these deep links quite useful:
http://data.ncof.co.uk:8080/ncWMS/wms?LAYERS=glo_arctic%2Fiicethic&ELEVATION=0&TIME=2012-09-18T12:00%3A00.000Z&TRANSPARENT=true&STYLES=BOXFILL%2Frainbow&CRS=EPSG%3A32661&COLORSCALERANGE=0,4&NUMCOLORBANDS=254&LOGSCALE=false&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.3.0&REQUEST=GetMap&EXCEPTIONS=XML&FORMAT=image/png&BBOX=-1000000,-1000000,5000000,5000000&WIDTH=256&HEIGHT=256
Posted by: Arcticio | September 20, 2012 at 08:33
Hi Arcticio,
I was attempting to get to the menu, but no luck.
The Sept 19, 2012 sea ice concentration and thickness are posted.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 21, 2012 at 05:20
> attempting to get to the menu
Don't get it, images with menus?
Btw.: Do you have an idea why not thickness data end of 2011?
Posted by: Arcticio | September 21, 2012 at 06:25
Arcticio,
I was looking for how you ran the data to get your map.
Here is the link I think I was looking for:
http://data.ncof.co.uk:8080/ncWMS/
On the thickness data at the end of 2011, I can only presume they changed data sources or created a new data set. There have been a number of ways this data has been compiled.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 21, 2012 at 14:42
For those interested in an archive of Arctic sea ice concentration imagery - see the following NOAA link, which has imagery back to 1995:
ftp://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/ice/nh/
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 24, 2012 at 15:06
The Sept 20 sea ice thickness and concentration maps and kmzs are posted.
https://sites.google.com/site/apocalypse4realseaice2012/home/sea-ice-concentration-and-thickness-comparison
I plan to post the Sept 25 files tomorrow.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 26, 2012 at 05:12
I have added a new column to the NCOF sea ice thickness and concentration maps.
The new imagery is the MMAB Arctic ice concentration from:
http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/seaice/Analyses.html
I will update the NCOF data for Sept 25 and 30 when available.
Posted by: Apocalypse4Real | September 30, 2012 at 16:39
Someone just asked about the Apocalypse imagery over at Realclimate in the new Unforced Variations thread. I found no contact info at the Apoc google blog page and Google led me here. If its author still reads here -- please fix the problem handling missing data.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/01/unforced-variations-jan-2013/
Posted by: Hank Roberts | January 02, 2013 at 17:45
I found the current thread with comments from the Apocalypse author, at
http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2012/12/looking-for-winter-weirdness-4.html
Posted by: Hank Roberts | January 02, 2013 at 22:26