It all sounds so simple: Arctic sea ice is retreating, so let's get over there and start some off-shore drilling! Unfortunately the Arctic isn't a friendly place, not to humans and not to oil executives.
Commenter Lodger links to this ominous news article about the Kulluk, "a $290 million offshore oil rig operated as part of Shell’s Arctic drilling efforts in summer", that has washed up at Ocean Bay on Sitkalidak Island, close to Kodiak Island's southeast shores.
All of it is worth a read, but here's the most interesting bit:
It's been a tumultuous several days for the Kulluk, which saw itself disconnected from the tug boats charged with moving the vessel from Alaska to the Lower 48 for the winter. Earlier this year, the Kulluk performed exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea for Shell.
For Shell, which has invested more than $4.5 billion to drill for oil and gas in Alaska’s Arctic, the latest troubles raise questions about how prepared the company -- as well as the Coast Guard -- are for problems in the far north.
The Kulluk and its tug weren't operating above the Arctic Circle when the problems started late last week. And the Coast Guard's Alaska headquarters at Kodiak are located relatively nearby the grounded Kulluk, making response efforts easier than in the Arctic, where the agency has no base. That has some Alaskans wondering what would happen if similar troubles ever occur in the much more remote and hostile Arctic Ocean.
"The implications of this very troubling incident are clear -- Shell and its contractors are no match for Alaska’s weather and sea conditions either during drilling operations or during transit," said Lois Epstein, the Arctic program director for The Wilderness Society, late Monday in a statement. "Shell’s costly drilling experiment in the Arctic Ocean needs to be stopped by the federal government or by Shell itself, given the unacceptably high risks it poses to both humans and the environment."
The tugs Aiviq and Nanuq tow the mobile drilling unit Kulluk while a
Coast Guard Jayhawk helicopter lifts off from the Kulluk with a crew
member aboard Saturday. The Royal Dutch Shell rig ran aground Monday,
after days of problems with its towing journey in the Alaskan Gulf (source: Petty Officer 1st Class Sara Francis/U.S. Coast Guard, via NPR).
This is happening as we speak. The oil rig is grounded in "rocky" Ocean Bay, with 150,000 gallons of diesel, oil, and hydraulic fluid on board, with the following not-so-reassuring weather forecast:
Seas are expected to be up to 33 feet by Tuesday, with the potential for 40-foot waves as a large storm system delivers moisture from as far south as California. Satellite imagery shows the bulk of the storm headed right for Kodiak.
“They're in the bulls-eye of the whole thing,” said National Weather Service Meteorologist Dan Peterson, who said the weather service is updating the unified command center hourly.
Shell's drilling fleet has been plagued with a string of delays and problems this summer, and the engine failures aboard the Aiviq came just one day after revelations that the company's massive drillship, Noble Discoverer, was delayed for several weeks in Seward after being ordered to stay put for repairs to safety and pollution prevention systems.
Here's a video the Coast Guard made and put up on YouTube (the videos in the right hand bar that can be clicked and take you to footage of the Deepwater Horizon drill spill, are there by pure coincidence). It shows the oil rig, the two tugs, and the helicopter that evacuated the 18 crew members aboard the rig:
I know Shell and its employees want/have to make big profits for their shareholders, I mean create wealth and freedom for the poor on our planet, and they probably have put revenues from Arctic fossil fuels in the books already, so that the whole economy breaks down if they don't drill and dig all of it out, but let's not go there, okay? Let's just not go there.
Let's be creative and innovative, cut down on our dependency on Shell and co, and do something better, something smarter.
Happy 2013, everyone.
Update 1
From the Guardian:
Susan Childs, emergency incident commander for Shell, suggested a significant spill from the ship was unlikely.
"The unique design of the Kulluk means the diesel fuel tanks are isolated in the centre in the vessel and encased in very heavy steel," she said.
Shell was waiting for the weather to moderate to begin a complete assessment of the ship, she said. "We hope to ultimately recover the Kulluk with minimal or no damage to the environment."
Noted.
Update 2
The Alaska Dispatch article has been updated:
U.S. Coast Guard Capt. Paul Mehler, the incident commander, said the Kulluk appears sound as of Tuesday afternoon, with no breach of hull and no discharge of fuel, lubricant or hydraulic fluid apparent from Coast Guard over-flights.
Mehler told reporters that the Kulluk grounding is now considered a salvage operation.Over 500 people are now involved with the operations, according to officials with the Unified Command center. Of that, 250 are stationed in an Anchorage hotel ballroom, monitoring operations from afar.
Mehler described the operation as dynamic, thanks to challenging weather battering the area. Multiple Coast Guard aircraft have been deployed to the area, one of which is carrying a salvage crew the Coast Guard hopes to deploy on the Kulluk as soon weather allows. Although the Kulluk is stable, it is moving back and forth as strong seas batter the drilling rig.
“It's aground; it's swaying, but it's not moving,” he said.
Steve Russell, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation's on-scene coordinator, added that while the Kulluk is stable, it still poses a serious environmental threat.
Russell said the customized response plans are being drafted. However, what those plans could be are unclear. After delivering brief statements, officials took few questions from gathered members of the press, citing a need to return to the recovery effort. Another press conference is being planned for this evening, at which officials said more time will be given for questions.
And questions are mounting over whether Shell -- a Netherlands-based oil and gas giant -- cut corners as it has pursued an ambitious, multibillion-dollar drilling program in Alaska's far northern waters over the past seven years.
Googling the term 'Kulluk' also brings you to this piece of info on a site that looks like it's Shell's:
Built in 1983 by the Japanese Mitsui company, the Kulluk drilling platform is vintage, tried and tested technology that exemplifies the best of Shells's Let's Go! arsenal. Among the Kulluk's exciting technologies are a 24-foot diameter glory hole bit for punching holes deep in the ice, a 20,000-foot drill pipe, 160-foot derrick, 49.5-foot rotary table, 1000-hp top drive, 500-ton swivel, and a 400,000-pound drill string compensator!Though the Kulluk is now almost 30 years old, she was inactive for fourteen of them, making her as reliable as a much younger craft.(...)
The Kulluk has recently been upgraded with new electronics. Her hull has been fully repaired, making her as Arctic ready as it's possible for a rig to be! To celebrate the Kulluk's revival, we've also significantly improved the look of the vessel, with a keel-to-topmast repainting job. And to make life more pleasant for Arctic-going workers, we've remodelled some interiors.No oil company has ever operated in an environment as extreme as the Arctic, let alone with heritage equipment—yet that's exactly the sort of challenge that makes the Arctic so appealing to many of us at Shell.On the slight chance that something does go wrong, Shell's spill cleanup plan is second to none. No one has yet fully determined how to clean up an oil spill in pack ice or broken ice—but that too is exactly the sort of challenge we love.
Could be the work of the Yes Men. Or Dr Inferno's. I think it's funny, although it isn't.
Update 3
Today this image was posted at Alaska Dispatch. It's made by the US Coast Guard and shows the grounded Kulluk:
And a tidbit of info:
A White House source said that Obama’s staff was aware of the situation and was monitoring it on New Year's Day, highlighting the national implications of Shell’s mishap and what it might mean for U.S. energy policy.
Luckily, no spill as of yet.
Update 4 (January 7th)
The Kulluk has been towed to a safer place. Alaska Dispatch:
Finally, the Royal Dutch drilling unit Kulluk has a happy chapter in its tortured journey out of Alaska.
Officials confirmed Monday that the Kulluk reached safe harbor in Kiliuda Bay about 10 a.m. Monday after a 45-mile tow lasting about 12 hours from where the vessel ran aground off of Sitkalidak Island nearly a week ago.
Exactly where the Kulluk will sit in secluded Kiliuda Bay will be determined by environmental conditions, including weather, officials said. The extent of the vessel's damages from its grounding will be examined there.
The Coast Guard Cutter Alex Haley escorted the Kulluk and its tow tug the Aiviq -- along with two oil spill response vessels and other support vessels. A 500-yard radius safety zone around the Kulluk remains in place in Kiliuda Bay, which is far more shelted from nasty weather blowing that sometimes blows in from the Gulf of Alaska.
No signs of any oil discharge during the trip were seen.
Now we await whether this has any effect on policy with regards to Arctic drilling.
Update 5
According to the Independent the Kulluk was where it was for an interesting reason. All the risks were taken so that less taxes would have to be paid. This, ironically, reminds me of a certain group in the climate debate that I rant against in Looking for winter weirdness 5.
Here are some quotes from the Independent article:
Shell’s ill-fated attempt to tow an offshore oil rig from Alaska to Seattle in the final days of December was motivated by a desire to avoid $7m (£4.3m) of Alaskan state taxes, it emerged today.But the oil giant will instead suffer a multi-million dollar loss on the exercise after the rig ran aground off the Alaskan coast on Monday night.
However, because the rig ran aground late on New Year’s Eve and began 2013 within three miles of the Alaskan coast, Shell remains liable for a unique state property tax on equipment dedicated to oil and gas development and exploration.
Shell admitted today that its decision to move the rig, the Kulluk, just weeks after it was brought to the Gulf of Alaska in November, was motivated by financial considerations.
(...)
The Kulluk began its journey on 21 December and a week later was about 50 miles south of Kodiak Island – out of reach of the Alaskan tax man.
But the tug that was pulling it suffered multiple engine failures just as a subtropical cyclone made its way into the North Pacific. On Monday night, in the dying hours of 2012, the rig ran aground about 1,600 feet from Sitkalidak Island, next door to Kodiak.
How embarassing, but nothing compared to what would have happened if there had been an oil spill.
I agree wholeheartedly -- and Happy New Year, Neven. Thanks again for your wonderful efforts last year, and I hope you and yours have luck and well-deserved happiness in the new one. - Wayne
Posted by: Wayne Kernochan | January 01, 2013 at 18:56
Neven,
Tad Patzek made an interesting post at his blog recently, which sketches out some of the difficulties of arctic operations:
http://patzek-lifeitself.blogspot.ca/2012/12/oil-in-arctic.html
Warnings abound...
Who is really listening I wonder?
Posted by: Lucas Durand | January 01, 2013 at 19:26
Thanks, Lucas, for an interesting read. And thanks to you too, Wayne.
Posted by: Neven | January 01, 2013 at 22:10
They _will_ be creative and innovative, very much so. Oil exploration consists of a collection of different techniques. Some techniques have been tried but proven too expensive/elaborate/slow and have been archived and collecting dust for occasions just like this.
It's better to look at it as a junkie scheming for ways to get hold of some junk for the next fix, nothing is sacred.
Posted by: Just Testing | January 01, 2013 at 22:20
Neven wrote:
Hmm, not exactly. This latest incident happened in the Gulf of Alaska, to the south of the Aleutian islands, a fair 200 km to the south of Kodiak island. In a region where the sea never freezes, that is since the end of the last Ice Age.
Therefore Shell never found itself restricted there by ice fields, not even by icebergs.
Posted by: Kris | January 02, 2013 at 01:57
I'm sorry, Kris, I forgot to link to the Alaska Dispatch article, but I did write "a $290 million offshore oil rig operated as part of Shell’s Arctic drilling efforts in summer". And the Guardian article has this:
Shell used the Kulluk in September and October to drill a prospect in the Beaufort Sea. It was being taken to Seattle for the off-season when the problems began.
Put simply: The Kulluk is where it is because of oil in the Arctic that Shell wants to drill. So there you go.
Posted by: Neven | January 02, 2013 at 02:06
There's a second update at the end of the post.
Posted by: Neven | January 02, 2013 at 02:17
Spill, baby, spill.
Posted by: idunno | January 02, 2013 at 03:12
Catching up on Fall 2012 news, on Oct 10 the EU voted NOT to impose a moratorium on Arctic drilling:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/10/europe-rejects-ban-arctic-oil-drilling
To fully appreciate the irony of today's event, consider the time difference between Alaska and Washington DC. The Kulluk ran aground almost exactly as the USA hit the 'fiscal cliff', which occurred at the stroke of midnight on New Year's eve.
Snap! Dickens in da House! Can you hear that rattling? That's the Ghost of Oil Spill Futures. Just ask Munich Re how that's workin' out.
Oh and BTW 'kulluk' means 'servitude' in Turkish. Just sayin' ;^)
Cheers,
Lodger
Posted by: Artful Dodger | January 02, 2013 at 06:17
Strange coincidence, but I was in that area a few years ago. I was part of a delivery crew transporting a boat from San Francisco to Kodiak. On the way we stopped in the town of Old Harbor to drop off a bunch of school supplies for the kids.
Old Harbor is a little village of mostly native Americans. It's just across a narrow channel from Sitkalidak Island. The locals are dependent on fish for subsistence. A few fishing guides are also there, but it is so remote that it doesn't really draw in a lot of tourists. We also saw a large pod of orcas and numerous whales in that region. The people were super friendly. It would be a shame to see that place ruined by a spill.
Posted by: James Benison | January 02, 2013 at 07:33
Here's an interesting page on the people that live there.
http://oldharbortribal.org/ohtc/about-us/about-us.html
Posted by: James Benison | January 02, 2013 at 09:07
That is a spoof site.
http://arcticready.com/social/gallery
although quite thoroughly made.
"Shell.com" linking back to the same site also is a giveaway.
Posted by: Enno | January 02, 2013 at 09:19
As such, it is of course completely justified. Couldn´t agree more.
Posted by: Enno | January 02, 2013 at 09:22
And there's a third update now. An image, a vid, but not much more.
Posted by: Neven | January 02, 2013 at 15:33
First paragraph is misleading.
Also, some people on here might need to be a little less hypocritical. It's almost as if you're hoping for a spill just so you can have an excuse to bash the oil company some more.
Shameful behavior, IMO.
The Coast Guard said no spill, so just leave it at that.
Posted by: D | January 02, 2013 at 18:01
Leave it at that? (Day one on the rocks in 30' surf?)
Back in 2000, after 14 years of non-use in Tuktoyaktuk, the Canadians hired a consulting firm to generate a glowing account of the Kullak's previous performance in Beaufort sea ice:
ftp://ftp2.chc.nrc.ca/CRTreports/PERD/Kulluk_00.pdf
Fascinating bit about the shackle breaking -- was it really newly purchased, is there really a neutron beam facility in Dutch Harbor to check it for cracks (or can you hardly get a cup of warm coffee there)? I've heard that the abrupt loss of tension brought the Aiveq broadside to 40' swells, causing a 50 degree roll and sea water into the engine exhaust/air intakes. That, not asphaltine in deteriorated diesel, caused all four fuel injectors to fail.
We'll have to take Shell's word on the accident -- they've already announced their investigative report won't be made public. Mum's the word too at privately held Edison Chouest Offshore, the nation's largest maritime transport company (over 200 vessels including the Nathan B Palmer). The billionaire Chouest brothers are the largest single donor to Louisianna politician Scalise, exceeding even the Kochs. Scalise has been pressing the Obama administration non-stop to open up more areas for oil and gas exploration.
It is tricky to calculate the degree of sway from the Coast Guard video. The camera was held steady but seemingly not gyroscopically stabled. As the helicopter circles around the wreck at varying distances, the horizon is not quite level. Thus it is difficult to compute the maximal angle or periodicity of sway. The 'survivor anchor' was deployed prior to ground -- though what effect if any it is having remains obscure.
While it is great that the Kulluk is upright for now, I don't believe the 24-gon at the bottom was ever designed to pivot 9902 metric tons of deadweight. The rig is not grounded on a sand or gravel beach but rather off a rocky headland, in 5-6 fathoms. You can see rocks sticking out on all sides in the photos and the nav chart that I have attached.
I think they may end up having to build a breakwater around the wreck or a rock causeway out to it. Either way, not going to be easy to pump the oil ballast. It will have to be replaced with sea water to keep it stable until it can be cut up. Pulling it loose to sink it at sea is very dicey until all the lube and diesel have been lifted out.
I've attached a largish photomontage including a shot of Kulluk in sea ice, along with Dr. Woodgate's map of coastal currents.
Posted by: A-Team | January 02, 2013 at 18:38
Please explain, what exactly do you find misleading about it?
I don't give a flying f*** about bashing oil companies. I just want them to stay out of the Arctic and take their insanity elsewhere.
I think the damage is already done PR-wise, no spill needed. But if a spill were needed to get people to realize how insane it is to drill for oil in the Arctic, then so be it, let it spill.
Because the damage will be even greater when the Arctic is opened up for drilling. This is Keystone XXXL.
Posted by: Neven | January 02, 2013 at 19:00
Shell fought off 50 separate lawsuits (and bought off 50 separate legislators???) to get their Beaufort permits ... let's see how that goes from here on out. Are the Chinese willing to pay $20 a gallon for fuel?
Below is what the operational length of day looks like at this latitude -- and what it means to grapple lines in the dark in heavy seas and high wind. I've attached also a photo of what the bottom looks like at the rocky headland on the west end of Ocean Bay beach. It's a miracle that the wreck is so close to the largest coast guard air base in Alaska.
They have no air assets that could be deployed to the Beaufort Sea (aka Gyre). If the coast guard cutter Alex Haley had fouled their port propeller launching a line to the Kulluk there, that becomes a serious accident in its own right in the real Arctic.
This article may interest people in terms of drilling the Beaufort Sea in moving multi-year pack ice:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/44067367_Numerical_Simulation_of_the_Kulluk_in_Pack_Ice_Conditions
Posted by: A-Team | January 02, 2013 at 19:13
Here is what the underside of the rig looks like, the edge that will be rocking back and forth on the rocks for the rest of the winter. Note the rig is somewhat elliptical in shape -- I've not yet determined if the long axis is oriented parallel to shoreline. The fairleads penetrate the hull so that sea ice in the Beaufort does not mess up the 12 fixed anchors (which were not deployed here).
There are three listed endangered vertebrates whose designated critical habitat includes Sitkalidak Island -- Stellar sea lion, sea otter, Steller eider. It's not going to work having them oiled up. I could see haul-out and use of Partition Cove, especially behind low barrier. I wonder what they'll do about all the Kodiak bears in terms of salvage staging. Here's the link to American Land Conservancy projects there.
http://www.alcnet.org/projects/overview/alaska/sitkalidak
http://www.mxak.org/community/kulluk/kullukmore.html
Posted by: A-Team | January 02, 2013 at 19:40
Where is your $20/gallon for fuel figure coming from?
If accurate, the per-mile cost of operating a 100 MPG scooter with $20/gallon fuel will be lower than for $4/gallon gas into a 25 MPG automobile in the USA, since the mileage-based depreciation and maintenance/repair cost are about the same for both (about 20-25 cents/mile) and would be likely reduced in China due to cheap local labor.
Car in US:
fuel: 13-16 cents/mile
depreciation: 10-25 cents/mile
service: 3-15 cents/mile
insurance: fixed or < 6 cents/mile
Total: About 35-50 cents/mile
Scooter in China: fuel 20 cents/mile ($20/gallon, 100 MPG)
depreciation: 5 cents/mile ($1000/20,000 mi)
service: < 5 cents/mile (cheap labor!!!)
Total: < 30 cents/mile !!!
Those in China with incomes comparable to our US middle class could definitely afford $20/gallon fuel if they use scooters!
Posted by: Nightvid Cole | January 02, 2013 at 20:36
Shell is $4.5 billion into this already and not a drop of petroleum product to date. This is a multi billion dollar accident. And they're farther away then ever from sale of that first drop.
Here's the pre-refurbished Kulluk flaring out some heavy diesel smoke onto the Beaufort ice (no oil was ever produced). Shell is touting the 'ultra-low sulfur' bunker fuel on board now (a response to Native air pollution complaints) but sulfur content is irrelevant to marine water pollution or wildlife oiling. If there's a spill, get ready for the Coast Guard to roll over on use of dispersants despite the cold and currents. Sitkalatig Island is not BLM, FS or NPS land-- it is entirely owned by the Native Land Corp based in Old Harbor. Looks pristine in the oblique photo.
Looks to me like some video frames have the derrick about vertical whereas the worst I saw, after a huge wave hit, was a 9-10º tilt landward. However it is hard to get the horizon accurately because of the fog line. On the one hand, the 3" steel hull and eggshell design (for ice crushing) have to help; on the other, wobbling on rock was never in the engineering game plan.
Posted by: A-Team | January 02, 2013 at 20:54
A-Team:
The sway is more like 5 degrees, since the rigging is already shaped like a pyramid, and you're looking at it from an oblique angle.
Neven:
First paragraph implies this has anything to do with sea ice, which it doesn't. The accident is nowhere near the sea ice.
Posted by: D | January 02, 2013 at 21:52
It's not just blogs raising the warning. These Industry statements were all made before the Kulluk crash:
How long until these Big Banks pull the plug on Shell's Arctic ambitions? (Shell Investors / Shareholders):
Would YOU put your money in any of these institutions if they continue to place the Arctic region ecosystem at risk?
Shell has demonstrated a keystone-like inability to remove their drilling rig from the Chukchi sea safely before Winter storms wreck it. The U.S. Department of the Interior was wise to not allow Shell to drill into any oil-bearing strata in Summer 2012. There will be even less confidence that this enterprise can be conducted safely going forward.
Posted by: Artful Dodger | January 02, 2013 at 22:40
I'm sorry, D, but I don't agree. This accident has everything to do with (the disappearance of) sea ice.
Q: Why was that oil rig there in the first place?
A: Because they moved it away from the Beaufort Sea.
Q: Why was it in the Beaufort Sea?
A: To do some test drilling.
Q: Why was it doing test drilling there?
A: Because Shell expects to make huge returns on the 4.5 billion invested so far as the Arctic sea ice retreats.
And one other link to the sea ice: If they get in this much trouble without any sea ice or icebergs around, how will all those future oil rigs fare WITH sea ice and icebergs around?
A: It's an accident waiting to happen.
C: Don't go drilling in the Arctic. Just say no.
Posted by: Neven | January 02, 2013 at 22:51
C: Don't go drilling in the Arctic. Just say no.
Indeed.
Just ask Ben Bernanke to print those huge returns.
The FED is already laundering $80 billion of "bad debt" every month.
Why bother with drilling and extracting oil, if you can simply make money out of thin air. ;-)
Posted by: Hans Verbeek | January 02, 2013 at 23:17
Neven,
I just wanted to say that I recently changed my typepad screen name from "D" to "Lucas Durand".
I have no connection to any recent comments made (coincidentally) by any other "D"s.
Posted by: Lucas Durand | January 02, 2013 at 23:18
Thanks, Lucas. I remember you, you're building that cool house. :-)
Posted by: Neven | January 03, 2013 at 00:14
I've been reading the latest article about the Kulluk rig in our local Sydney paper
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-03/runaway-oil-rig-dragged-tugs-for-miles/4450990
I am staggered by the amount of money already spent in Arctic drilling and oil exploration but it's not surprising ( unfortunately ).
I can only see this continuing until the technology catches up to their desires, and it will. They will create the technology and machinery to do this. Maybe not this year or next but they will. Imagine how much money is going into R&D behind the scenes!
Thank you Neven for your continued effort in creating your blogs and providing us with so much incredible data.
Posted by: Kate | January 03, 2013 at 00:26
Kate, Jan 03, 00:26
In 2008, Shell, for $2.1 billion, won 275 blocks (in 4 “prospects”), of the 5,354 Chuchki Sea blocks offered in US federal lease sale 193. That sale area was estimated to contain between 4 and 77 billion barrels of oil equivalent. That’s were lots of that sum went. I can’t remember, and am too lazy to look-up the details, but have a hazy recollection that Shell’s leases to the east in the Beaufort Sea were purchased from other holders, as the much of that area’s federal leases were auctioned several decades ago. That’s also in the $4.5 billion. Shell did quite a bit more seismic work in ’09 and ’10 during and mobilized drilling fleets in those years as well as went through several court challenges between 2008 and 2-12.
Personally, I think the past burn of a billion or so $$ (only a guess) with no result lead Shell to a hurried effort in 2012 of putting into effect all the details required. They were months behind their announced schedule, primarily due readying the large ice going barge that was built to transport sections of the Prudhoe and adjacent oil fields processing facility, then sat for many years in San Diego. It was stationed this fall between the drill rigs with spill response gear, as part of Shell’s drilling permit requirement.
There was considerable off shore exploratory drilling along the Beaufort Sea coast of the Arctic Ocean both east and west from Prudhoe Bay in the 80’s and the ~160 m long, 15,000 dw ton drilling ship Noble Discoverer operated this summer in the Beaufort at a location north the western boundary of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Shell’s drilling permits require 2 drill platforms, each acting as the other’s relief-well driller if one experiences a rig disabling a blow-out. The permits also require drilling at “hydrocarbon zone” dept to end by 4-6 weeks before ice formation.
The Noble Discovered was towed into Seward at the end of November due to propeller vibrations, then held for several weeks by the Coast Guard to correct what that regulatory entity said were “pretty serious crew safety and pollution-prevention system” problems, observed when the CG conducted an normal investigation of the ship’s towing incident and apparently missed (?) by the pre-drilling inspection on her departure from Seattle.
Posted by: WhiteBeard | January 03, 2013 at 21:18
Arctic headwinds increase for Shell:
H/T Stephen Lacey at Climate Progress
Posted by: Artful Dodger | January 04, 2013 at 16:31
The island community of Kodiak recognizes that “sustainability” is a survival skill as well as a long-term development plan. The goal was to pair the great fisheries resources of the North Pacific and Bering Sea to renewable energy sources. Many years ago, Kodiak established a goal to increase renewable wind and hydro resources to meet 95% of the community’s electrical needs by 2020 and nine years ahead of schedule, we’re almost there. http://www.kodiak.org/business/renewable.html
Posted by: prokaryotes | January 05, 2013 at 18:28
The “unified command” organized for the salvage operation has its own website at kullukresponse.com, with a variety of materials and documents, including a partial transcript of the Saturday briefing
Posted by: prokaryotes | January 06, 2013 at 17:13
Eli hopes that everyone realizes how this ties in with the pursuit of Charles Monnett by BOEM. Monnett's leaking of BOEM documents to PEER caused a minimum of a four year delay in Shell's drilling in the Beaufort and Chuckchi Seas, that cost Shell a pile of money. If that was not enough, he blocked Shell from setting up a shell environmental study of the Arctic in place of a real one.
Posted by: Eli Rabett | January 07, 2013 at 03:02
Thanks for clearing the Monnett story up!
Terry
Posted by: Twemoran | January 07, 2013 at 07:01
While not yet daylight here, the Kulluk is again under the tow of the Aiviq, the vessel Shell purpose built to operate with the drill rig. The current plan is to move her some 30 miles north to a sheltered inlet on Kodiak Island.
http://media.adn.com/smedia/2013/01/05/17/50/YIQ3b.St.7.jpg
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/default.aspx?mmsi=367141000¢erx=-152.8833¢ery=57.25517&zoom=10&type_color=3
Posted by: WhiteBeard | January 07, 2013 at 18:29
Thanks, WhiteBeard. There's a 4th and probably last update at the end of this post.
Posted by: Neven | January 07, 2013 at 23:12
The reason why Shell moved the Kulluk was simply tax evasion!
See: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-twist-in-stricken-rig-saga-shell-was-moving-it-to-avoid-tax-8439128.html
Posted by: Crozet Dutchie | January 08, 2013 at 01:46
Thanks a lot, Crozet Dutchie. So I guess that will be the last and very embarrassing update to the post.
Bunch of lunatics... :-|
Posted by: Neven | January 08, 2013 at 05:09
The Obama administration is to order a review of Shell's Arctic operations:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jan/08/shell-arctic-drilling-us-government-review?CMP=twt_gu
They were lucky. While the rig was still grounded, there was a 7.8 magnitude earthquake in the area, with a tsunami warning issued.
Posted by: idunno | January 09, 2013 at 09:35
They were lucky? Lucky?! They still had to pay taxes! How can they be lucky?
;-)
Posted by: Neven | January 09, 2013 at 11:21
Some UK government hypocricy:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/15/uk-arctic-oil-drilling-proposals
Posted by: idunno | January 15, 2013 at 16:10
A-team has more good news (posted form another thread):
Posted by: Neven | January 29, 2013 at 23:24
And some more:
Posted by: Neven | January 29, 2013 at 23:26
Worth noting that Shell is not the only player. The ExxonMobil/Rosneft partnership has been much less reported, but gets a mention here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21119774
Posted by: idunno | January 30, 2013 at 01:05
Shell game ...
Royal Dutch Shell announced it will dry-tow both the Kulluk and Noble Discoverer to Korean shipyards for expensive repairs, effectively ending prospects for Arctic drilling in 2013.
The Kulluk suffered unspecified hull damage, electrical system corrosion, and internal structural damage during its grounding. Built in 1983, it once drilled in the Beaufort Sea, last completing a well in 1993. Shell spent $292 million over six years upgrading it.
The Kulluk will be wet-towed from Kodiak Island (if hull damage allows) back to Dutch Harbor and dry-towed to Korea from there. Shell has not yet applied for the wet-tow permit. The Kulluk may end up being scrapped.
The Noble Discoverer, a log carrier built in 1966 and refurbished for Arctic drilling at a cost of $193 million, drilled only a single day last September. Shell was forced to disconnect the rig from its seafloor anchor as a large ice pack approached. Earlier, it slipped its mooring near Dutch Harbor in July and ran aground. Later in port, an engine backfired, starting a a smokestack fire.
However repairs in Korea are unrelated to these incidents -- its entire propulsion system, including the engine, needs to be replaced. The dry-tow from Seward across the Pacific Ocean will begin in 3-6 weeks and take 2-4 weeks.
In a dry-tow, a larger semi-submersible ship or floating drydock sinks itself below the draft of the rig to be towed. After floating the rig over the its deck, the dry-tow vessel is raised back up with the drill rig on its deck. This is necessary since the Kulluk has no engine of its own and that of the Noble Discoverer is damaged.
Posted by: A-Team | February 13, 2013 at 13:09
Once in a Korean dry dock, additional inspections will determine the full extent of repair work needed. This will be scheduled against existing shipyard commitments, delaying return to service to summer 2014 at the earliest. Victor Shipyards in Seattle, the original destination of the Kulluk, is no longer in the picture, evidently because of higher labor costs than Asia and lack of a large enough drydock.
Posted by: A-Team | February 13, 2013 at 13:16
Finding substitute ships is problematic: only two other rigs can operate in Arctic sea-ice condition -- the Orlan and the SDC. Neither is available. The Orlan is already contracted out for drilling operations at rival Exxon Mobil and Rosneft projects off Sakhalin Island; the SDC is only sporadical leased, most recently 2006 for the Canadian Arctic.
The SDC cannot replace either the Kulluk or Noble Discoverer as it operates only to 80 feet, whereas both of Shell's drilling sites are in 200 feet of water. Rental rates for not-quite-Arctic harsh-climate rigs run $350,000 a day. Two rigs are always required so a relief well can be drilled.
Shell has spent nearly $5 billion on permits, personnel and equipment over the past six years. That includes extensive infrastructure in Wainwright, Barrow and Deadhorse such as crew camps and an airplane hanger plus a half billion dollars of special emergency oil spill response systems.
Posted by: A-Team | February 13, 2013 at 13:17
Looks like Shell decided to not even try drilling in the Arctic in 2013 according to news reports.
Posted by: Ghoti Of Lod | February 28, 2013 at 03:36