Guest Post by R. Gates
Russia has ordered an "urgent" evacuation of it's drifting ice station known as North Pole-40 that sits on top Arctic sea ice, because of disintegrating sea ice that is posing dangerous conditions to reseachers. This is one more indication that the thickness of the ice is now getting very thin at places it was not before, a metric not fully captured in the extent and area data.
Barents Observer reports:
Floating research station in need of evacuation
The scientific research station was placed on the ice floe in October 2012 and was planned to stay there until September. Now the floe has already started to break apart and the crew has to be evacuated as soon as possible.
Russia’s Minister of Nature Resources and Ecology Sergey Donskoy has ordered that a plan for evacuation should be ready within three days, the Ministry’s web site reads.
“A collapse of the station’s ice floe poses a threat to its continued work, the lives of the crew, the environment close to the Canadian Economic Zone and to equipment and supplies”, a note from the minister reads.
Donskoy suggests that the nuclear-powered icebreaker “Yamal” could evacuate the station from the floe and move it to Severnaya Zemlya.
With ice levels in the Arctic reaching record lows, finding a suitable floe for the station proved to be a difficult task last autumn. The icebreaker carrying the station’s crew had to sail all around the North Pole before finding an ice floe solid enough to hold the station. None of the three floes that had been pre-evaluated from land as possible objects were considered safe enough.
Also the previous shift of Russian scientists experienced problems with the ice situation in the Arctic. In late April the members of North Pole-39 had to move the whole research station to another ice floe because the first one was breaking up.
Only three times has a station had to be evacuated before schedule. The last time was in 2010, when the icebreaker “Rossiya" had to go out and rescue the people on the floating station “North Pole-37” already in May.
Read the rest here, or over at PhysOrg, BBC, NDTV, Channel NewsAsia and many more.
Here's the current position of NP-40, as shown on the AARI website:
Let's hope the evacuation is a success.
Russia Today provides some more information:
http://rt.com/news/russia-evacuates-polar-station-708/
The head of Russia’s high-latitude Arctic expeditions Vladimir Sokolov said "currently there is no threat to personnel".
The Yamal nuclear-powered icebreaker is scheduled to leave for the drifting polar station on May 31, and it will take the ship about 10 days to reach NP-40.
Posted by: Jim Hunt | May 24, 2013 at 00:12
The current position of North Pole-40 is close to the minimum ice extent boundaries for both September 2007 and September 2012.
If that area is already melting it raises the possibility that the 2012 minimum ice extent in that region might end up considerably closer to the pole.
Posted by: Entropic man | May 24, 2013 at 00:24
Phooey, I was hoping the Arctic Sea Ice Blog community could pool enough donations at PalPal to send Neven on a well-deserved junket to the North Pole. Lots of activities such as practising kayak self-rescue and determining camp ice thickness and temperature of underlying sea water.
Although the 'Camp Barneo-2013 costs up to $35,000 per visitor, with this evacuation, I was thinking those tickets might now be discounted to tip jar levels. However it is not an option: the camp closed a week earlier this year, on April 25 due to faster ice melt at 89N.
I rotated and rescaled the North Pole-40 (yes, that's abbreviated SP-40) drift track onto the 23 May 13 Jaxa color image of the ice. This does not quite have the resolution needed to pick up the camp's ice floe, which has crumbled into 6 pieces. It does seem to be still located in multi-year ice for what that is worth (less and less each year), not quite centrally but nowhere near its perimeter either.
Posted by: A-Team | May 24, 2013 at 00:29
Wow A-Team you forever amaze! I think your graphic would make a nice momento for the Russian scientists who had to abandon North Pole 40. Something they can give their grandchildren and say, "Da! See little Anatoly, there once actually enough sea ice out there that we actually had camps on it!"
Posted by: R. Gates | May 24, 2013 at 05:24
Earlier this year, two major news outlets in the U.S., NPR (National
Public Radio) and the Christian Science Monitor, ran stories about
a new literary term making the rounds among writers and publishers
called "cli fi" (for climate fiction). While some pundits have said
it's a new genre, others have said it's really just a subgenre of sci
fi. Readers -- and marketing people -- will be the judges.
Taiwan's entry into this new genre of sci fi and fantasy, "The Man
with Compound Eyes" by Taipei eco-fantasy writer Wu Ming-yi, will be
published in an English translation in the fall, and it fits neatly
into the cli fi category because it takes place in the future -- 2029
in Taiwan -- and encompasses themes of enviromentalism and global
warming.
In addion, Vincent C.F. Huang, a Taiwanese eco-artist based in Taipei, has been active over the past
few years with his climate-themed shows and exhibitions overseas, from Tuvalu's beaches to a United Nations climate conference in Doha, Qatar in the Middle East.
Angela Evancie, writing for the NPR website, put this way: "Over the
past decade, more and more writers have begun to set their novels and
short stories in worlds, not unlike our own, where the Earth's systems
are noticeably off-kilter. The genre has come to be called climate
fiction -- cli-fi, for short.|
Husna Haq, writing for the Monitor, said that "cli-fi, or 'climate
fiction,' describes a dystopian present, as opposed to a dystopian
future. And don't call it 'science fiction.' Cli-fi is literary
fiction."
WordSpy added the term to its list on new words, definding "cli fi" as
''a literary or movie genre featuring dystopian stories of Earth
affected by extreme climate change.''
After the NPR and Monitor stories went through the usual social media
stages of tweets and retweets, a literature professor at the
University of Oregon, Stephanie LeMenager, created a seminar that she
will teach early next year titled "The Cultures of Climate Change."
"This course [will take] global anthropogenic climate change as a case
study through which to explore the interdisciplinary axes of the
environmental humanities," LeMenager wrote in the online course
description. "The course examines the cultures of climate change from
the perspective of academic humanists and artist-activists. Our
primary theoretical emphases derive from science studies and new
materialist critique, such as the work of Bruno Latour, Anna Tsing and
Jane Bennett. To complement our critical reading, we’ll explore the
recently named genre of “cli-fi” or climate fiction (using the novels
of American writer Nathaniel Rich and British writer Daniel Kramb)."
Menager adds: "We will foray into the methods of documentary literatures and film, drawing theoretical insight from primary texts including Darryl Cunningham’s graphic narrative essay on GCC from ''Science Tales'', the film ''Sun Come Up'' (directed by Jennifer Redfearn in 2010), Ursula Biemann’s videography project ''Deep Weather'', and the web archive ''The Canary Project''.
In addition, she said that the ''guiding course concerns will include bridge-building between the twocultures of the sciences and the humanities, the value and effect of traditional and new media genres, and establishing a working definition of the environmental humanities as an academic field and public intellectual practice.''
LeMenager is an associate professor in the English department at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where she has taught since 2000.
We can now say that cli fi is a broad category, and it can apply to climate-themed novels
and movies that take place in the present or the future, and even in
the past. And cli fi novels can be dystopian in nature, or utopian, or
just plain ordinary potboiler thrillers.
So move over sci fi, here comes cli fi. With carbon dioxide emissions
in terms of parts per million (ppm) now hovering at around 400 ppm,
cli fi writers have their work cut out for them now. Wu Ming-yi's cli
fi novel in translation, to be published in New York and London in
September, will be part of this new genre.
Posted by: Danny Bloom | May 24, 2013 at 05:25
OK, that seems kind of... omen-like.
Right. "Ominous." Now I remember the word.
Posted by: Kevin McKinney | May 24, 2013 at 05:38
Now Neven you know this will be discarded as "not new" and "has happened before", so it's not "news".
Of course the news is that it is now becoming commonplace and, in the near future will not happen at all because they won't find any ice to put a stable drifting ice station on to anyway.....
I had considered going onto "They who shall not be named" to see what they are blathering on about on this subject. But my equilibrium is not that good at the moment and I would probably have to say something impolite which would ruin my day and I really do need to get some work done....
Posted by: NeilT | May 24, 2013 at 09:23
@danny
Do you remember the swathe of books which came out in the 1970's, turned into films, which were in response to the original worries about climate change.
Many of them, in the way of the last century, had us living in environment domes with a poisonous desertified environment outside. All set in.... 2030 - 2050...
I believe the first flush of expectation in the sci fi world has slowed. We now understand that the barrier between a mechanistic advance and a quantum physics advance is exponentially different in time and effort.
We also, now, seem to understand that the climate fights back. That it won't be overwhelmed quite so easily. But we also have 7bn people on the planet now and that brings new insights into our future in a changing climate.
In the end I wonder if human stupidity will outdo the imagined reality of the novelists???
Posted by: NeilT | May 24, 2013 at 09:28
@ A-Team
You probably know this already, but there is a rather good reason why the Russians use the abbreviation SP for this floating observation station.
"Severnaya" is Russian for Northern, as in Severnaya Zemlya
Do svedanya comrades
bill lyaguska
Posted by: Bill Fothergill | May 24, 2013 at 10:09
Climate Fiction from the 1950s, some really odd, all from memories of the epoch:
J G Ballard, multiple novels
The Wind from Nowhere
The Drowned Earth
Neville Shute (? so my memory says) We Who Survived...the 5th(iirc) Ice Age
The Storm
At least one episode of Science Fiction Theater ... meteor strikes hurricane, really spins it up, to an otherwise impossible iirc 230 MPH.
George Phillies
...former librarian, MIT Science Fiction Society
Posted by: George Phillies | May 24, 2013 at 11:30
The Long Winter by John Christopher - more of a social commentary than sci fi though.
Coming up on June 7 is the movie After Earth. A father and son crash land on a post global warming earth and try to survive. In the words of the Father "Everything on this planet has evolved to kill humans."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZIt20emgLY
Posted by: Villabolo | May 24, 2013 at 18:54
cli-fi 1960 style - full movie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJvdVi4K7rI
My regular readers will know that I haven't written much because of RSI - it was too painful to use the mouse. I have been playing catch up for a while now.
I have just linked to this article in a new article:
http://www.science20.com/chatter_box/arctic_2013-113072
Good news: China and USA to cooperate on global warming:
http://www.science20.com/chatter_box/green_step_humanity-112837
Posted by: logicman | May 24, 2013 at 22:46
Patrick!
Good to see you back again.
Your Friend Espen
Posted by: Espen Olsen | May 24, 2013 at 23:22
Thanks to A-team's winter animations, we can guess that the only solid place left in the arctic for North Pole-40 is the goats head. Being an old goat myself I would like to find out more about this object.
Posted by: Charles Longway | May 25, 2013 at 02:02
The goat's head is currently parked over the pole. Since it is multi-year ice, we won't have the drama of open water at the North Pole at peak melt if this situation persists.
However multi-year ice visco-elastically 'relaxes' like cold paint as it warms and as buttressing first-year ice is removed, I expect the goat's head to ease back towards the Siberian shore as the season progresses.
What's left of it. The left horn may be degrading. The goat's head forms an easily recognizable marker on the periphery of the main body of multi-year ice that can be tracked for 3-4 years.
As an extended asymmetric form, its rotation can be measured along with translation (unlike buoys which are translation-only).
Mass balance buoy 2012J was placed in 1.09 m ice in the Laptev Sea 25 Aug 12 by the Polarstern very near and possibly in the outer goat's head.
Neither the ice bottom sounder nor air pressure instrument have been working since mid-December but from thermistor data, the ice now is 1.94 m thick and the snowpack is still 0.26m with air temperature -4.63 ºC.
The first animation shows its movement since 08 Sep 12 at weekly intervals, then daily the last ten days using Ascat microwave. The second animation is a blow-up of motion from the first of March to today using Jaxa color imagery.
Posted by: A-Team | May 26, 2013 at 17:27
Last year there were buoys that were in the location where the goats head is now. Those all got flushed out the Fram last year. We may be watching the goat's head on its final journey.
Posted by: Ghoti Of Lod | May 26, 2013 at 17:59
Indeed, it may get flushed out, melt, be sheared apart, or otherwise disintegrate. However it has survived even more extreme positions vis-a-vis the Fram's preconditioning zone in years past.
Looking at the buoy 2012J spreadsheet, it was placed at noon Aug 25, 2012 at 82.8804 N and 49.9423 E. Since Jaxa was operational then, the longitude can be accurarely located on the image using the angle measure in Gimp, with latitude scaled relative to the number of pixels to the 70th parallel which exactly grazes the inlet peninsula of a Siberian bay near Wrangel.
The goat's head provided the only ice in the vicinity on this date. The ship's log in theory would provide more detail -- I located weekly reports for that date at WGI and the satellite photo they were using but not yet helicopter imagery of the 2012J placement site. (Let's just say they hardly needed an icebreaker on this trip.)
The center pixel in the pink circle below is my best estimate of where the Polarstern placed the instrumentation -- neither Jaxa nor Modis has nearly enough resolution to match the emplaced GPS. Today the buoy lies 89.3248 N 59.3325 E which lies within the blackout zone of polar orbit satellites (which for Jaxa is 89.18 N). The buoy was last visible to Jaxa on 01 May 13.
Thus it would not be difficult to track the evolving microwave properties of the ice in which the buoy sits over those dates, though the satellite resolution is not quite there.
Posted by: A-Team | May 26, 2013 at 19:33
A-Team wrote: | May 26, 2013 at 17:27
Hi A-Team, hope you had a great time in Utah.
It's unlikely that the Goat is headed to Siberia ;^) Sea ice at the North pole is caught in the transpolar drift stream:
Look at the GPS Track history for O-Buoy 4 & 6 (.csv data files are available).
Indeed, N. pole sea ice is riding the Marrakesh Express to the E. Greenland sea. Expect the Goat's Head to pass through Fram strait by September.
We should have got off that express train back in '69. And it too late now for covers.
Cheers,
Lodger
P.S. Happy to my friends in the USA. Let's take a moment to remember all those that sacrificed so that we could have freedom. Thank-you for your service.
Posted by: Artful Dodger | May 27, 2013 at 05:15
FishOutofWater is doing great work over at Daily Kos on Arctic sea ice, and now with a further report on the Russian ice station, but there are a couple of things he needs to watch out for:
1) What the ACNFS model forecasts is not how things play out, at least not in the short term. It looks spectacular, but the observations don't. We discussed this rather extensively in the past couple of days in the If this is real... and New map on the block posts.
2) The same goes for changing colours on the Uni Bremen SIC maps. Only when they stay in place for 3 days or more, is there something going on. There's always a lot of yellow, green and pink swathes appearing one day and then disappearing the next. That's just clouds and/or melt ponds or other stuff fooling the sensors.
3) It's not the first time the Russian ice station gets evacuated. It happened three times before according to the Barents Observer article I link to above.
According to CRREL buoy 2012G that is located next to the Russian NP-40 the cyclone has bottomed out at around 987 hPa. Could've been worse, but could've been better too.
I said this before, but recently I translated a documentary by the French guys who tried to sail straight across the ice pack, from Barrow to Svalbard, with a catamaran with skis under it (to sail over the ice). In it they also show footage of a storm they were in (I reported it at the time as it showed some spectacular flash melting, for which it is now too early), not too far from where the Russians are now.
They found an ice floe that looked big and strong enough to withstand the storm. It was 100 square metres before the storm, and just 15 after it.
I made an animation of the storm at the time, and it seems it was about as strong as this one, and lasted around the same time:
The big difference of course, is that the French guys were in the storm towards the end of August, and now it's the start of may, so hopefully the ice floe(s) the Russian research station is on, are strong enough.
Those French guys, BTW, are going to have another go this year. The ironic thing is that it would have been much easier for them a couple of years ago, as there was more ice to sail on. On the other hand, there is more, flat first-year ice now, so maybe they should go as early as possible...
Posted by: Neven | June 05, 2013 at 18:25
@Neven thx for kind words. I don't know if you've already discussed this, but what I was particularly interested in was the way he discussed particular areas (Northern Maritimes, Barents/Siberian Seas, NP) and their possible differences in melt given less thickness in that area right now -- which is likely to determine both area and volume outcomes compared to 2012 in Sept. To put it colloquially: If it's thinner now in the areas that haven't yet melted out in past years, then the signs aren't good for a 2012-type Sept. result -- and the cracking leading to more side melting could counteract lower initial temps.
Am I missing something comforting?
Posted by: Wayne Kernochan | June 05, 2013 at 21:20
Yes, the latest PIOMAS update! ;-)
Posted by: Neven | June 05, 2013 at 21:28