In some quarters extreme weather events and broken records are presented as evidence that the climate isn't changing. That's a bit difficult to do with Arctic sea ice, of course (although they try*), but record Antarctic sea ice numbers fully compensate for this, right?
The 2013/2014 Arctic winter has been relatively warm (more on that when we have the maximum behind us), but the other side of the coin has been extreme cold over North America, resulting in another ice extreme: the Great Lakes freezing over as they haven't done since records began.
Here are two images I've nicked from Spanish/Basque Arctic expert Diablobanquisa, who in turn got them from MODIS and the Canadian Ice Service (including the small image on top, click for a larger version):
Plus ça devient extrême, plus c'est la même chose...
---
* hat-tip goes to HotWhopper for the link
"...the Great Lakes freezing over as they haven't done since records began."
Quoi?
Currently at 88% ice cover, and short of the 1994 figure of 90.7%, according to te abc story linked above.
Posted by: idunno | March 06, 2014 at 14:53
Warm rivers play role in Arctic sea ice melt
The heat from warm river waters draining into the Arctic Ocean is contributing to the melting of Arctic sea ice each summer, a new NASA study finds.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140305134019.htm
Posted by: Boa05att | March 06, 2014 at 15:01
Sorry pour la confusion, idunno. That was lazy linking in my part. The ABC article is actually a correction of a Feb 14 article.
I now link to this from AccuWeather:
Posted by: Neven | March 06, 2014 at 15:47
Strangely enough, the Accuweather article says this:
But then goes on to say this:
Either way, I watched that bar graph from the Canadian Ice Service and then assumed that ice coverage this winter has been the highest on record.
First, second, whatever, it disproves AGW. ;-)
Posted by: Neven | March 06, 2014 at 15:56
"First, second, whatever, it disproves AGW. ;-)"
It's CUSAFF (Catastrophic US Anthropogenic F Freezing)
Another nail prised from the coffin of the lamented Dr Inferno...
http://denialdepot.blogspot.fr/2012/09/the-ice-age-is-coming.html
Posted by: idunno | March 06, 2014 at 17:07
As a big picture guy I see it like this:
AGW means more heat coming in than going out.
Most of this extra heat is outside the arctic.
Heat always moves from hot to cold.
Melting arctic ice is a measure of how fast this heat moves from hot to cold.
This happens primarily through winds and currents.
Cold coming down from the arctic is heat moving into the arctic.
Record cold temperatures in the temperate zone means record heat transported into the arctic.
Posted by: Mdoliner43 | March 06, 2014 at 17:11
Completely irrelevent, untrue, gratuitous, and possibly libelous ad-hominem (mods,please delete)...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=neven
...apart from the nice bits.
;)
Posted by: idunno | March 06, 2014 at 20:20
The Canadian Ice Service graph is an annual "week of graph". Earlier years highest percentage ice cover occurred in late January or early February. And remember these "records" are only from the satellite period, although this winter is definitely in the coldest 5% to 20% of the weather records period,throughout the lakes region.
Posted by: Carex | March 06, 2014 at 23:43
You're right! I overlooked that.
Posted by: Neven | March 07, 2014 at 00:07
""By a long shot, this is the most ice we've had on Lake Superior in 20 years," Associate Professor at the Large Lakes Observatory in Duluth, Minn., Jay Austin said."
That is in the last 20 years. I highly suspect (although I am finding it hard to know where to get such data) that in the historical records that used to be very common.
Another big factor should be taken into consideration is the thickness. I live and work in the Toronto, Canada region. In Toronto harbour, it used to be common for people to skate on the ice in the winter time there. Even this year that would be a danger, because that ice really is not that thick as compared to pre 1990's.
It also should not be forgotten that the ice extent in the Arctic itself could reach a Maximum that could be near a record low.
As for the Antarctic. That as many factors involved, and you go back to thickness. If you include all the glaciers on land, by all reports, things are not in very good shape there either.
Posted by: LRC | March 07, 2014 at 02:27
When I was a kid in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, everyone paid attention to the ice in Lake Superior since it really modulated snowfall and temperature quite a bit. Some winters saw relatively complete freezes, some not. But the trend has been pretty dramatic--though this year's anomaly certainly is, too:
http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/ice/atlas/daily_ice_cover/intro.html
The atlas above doesn't go quite that far back, but may interest some.
Posted by: Kevin McKinney | March 07, 2014 at 02:45
Yet, if you look at the entire pan-arctic area it was , so far , a very warm winter. So we hear, "Arctic Blast" freezing the Great Lakes solid, but a closer look reveals the culprit, the continents which are historically unchanged, while the Arctic has its carpet pulled from under its feet.... http://eh2r.blogspot.ca/
Posted by: wayne | March 07, 2014 at 05:45
This winter's sea ice area maximum seems to have stayed below the minimal winter maximum so far. Also, the areas where the ice is "under attack" seem to be not just the periphery but rather the ice in the Svalbard and Bering areas. Or am I misreading this, and this situation is more common than I think and doesn't point to a new minimum in September?
Posted by: AmbiValent | March 07, 2014 at 08:48
As you have said, the Canadian Ice Service graph that I posted shows the ice cover for this week.
Looking at the "Total accumulated ice coverage" graph, this winter is the second highest (the highest is 1993/94): http://diablobanquisa.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/20140303180000_cvchactgl_0007547821.gif
Posted by: Diablobanquisa.wordpress.com | March 07, 2014 at 11:30
By the way, thanks for your words Neven, but I'm far from being an 'expert', just an amateur.
Posted by: Diablobanquisa.wordpress.com | March 07, 2014 at 11:47
Hola Diablo. Aqui un paisano :)
There is no much diference between experts and amateurs with regards to GW and what it entails since it is all new territory. Experts and amateurs alike have to deal with new data that is no longer the 'norm'.
Experts make studies on the field they are, well, experts at, but amateurs tend to read and analize studies from a varied range of fields/disciplines to get a better overall picture of what's going on. Keep the good work.
Posted by: Climate Changes | March 07, 2014 at 13:28
I grew up on the southern shore of Lake Superior. This winter was very much like what it was like when I was a kid back in the 70s. I'm grateful of this year's freeze-over -- it'll keep things cool this summer and maybe we won't have to run the air conditioner.
But I couldn't help thinking that it was like the lifeblood of the arctic spilling over us.
Posted by: ljgeoff | March 07, 2014 at 14:14
Lake ice peaked (hopefully) at 92.2% coverage, 2.5% below the Feb. 19, 1979 record of 94.7%.
Posted by: Carex | March 08, 2014 at 18:55
Lake ice peaked (hopefully) at 92.2% coverage on March 6, 2014.
Posted by: Carex | March 08, 2014 at 18:56
Well into the slide show, the photo of the large hill ~5 mi (8km) north of Unalakleet on the western coast of the Bering’s Norton Sound is interesting if you read that photo’s caption and take a look at the northern Norton Sound area on U Bremen’s ASMER2 chart. From considerably south of Unalakleet (63°52N -160°47′W), to the NE corner of Norton Sound and then extending well west beyond Nome (64°30′N - 165°23′W) there appears to be little ice.
Virtually always, the Iditarod's route is on the anchored near shore ice that seems to be absent this year. The land mask for charts from satellites instruments (and ASMER2 uses the highest pixel resolution I believe) excludes most shore fast ice as land, so there's little notice of this very unusual condition. At least without paws literally on the ground instead of the sea ice.
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/slideshow/photos-iditarod-comes-unalakleet
Posted by: WhiteBeard | March 11, 2014 at 00:51
Lake Michigan-Huron is now ice free. http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/glcfs/kml/glcfsmap.php?lake=a¶m=glsea&time=now
Posted by: Carex | May 18, 2014 at 01:26
Just to close out this thread. Lake Superior was ice free on June 7, 2014. One small area of ice north of Ironwood, MI was all that remained on June 6. A ski area web cam still shows one small patch of snow on the Keweenaw Peninsula.
Posted by: Carex | June 09, 2014 at 01:44
Thanks a lot for the info, Carex.
Posted by: Neven | June 09, 2014 at 08:34
Nice article :) for a very high resolution satellite imagery site visit my favorite site
[Link removed. Mail me if you're not a spambot. N.]
Posted by: tom barnes | December 14, 2014 at 16:08