A quite spectacular event took place during the past two weeks, and if it had continued for a while longer, I'm sure it would've been reported widely. It's something I've semi-jokingly alluded to when setting up this blog back in 2010, in my third blog post called Dire Straits, and a partial answer to the question commenter fredt34* asked at the time:
The big hole opening in East Greenland re-activated my interest for this question: will we see Greenland being circumnavigable this year? If not, when?
That was July 23rd 2010, and now a little over 8 years later, we have almost seen it happen: a corridor of open water between Fram Strait and the Lincoln Sea (where Nares Strait starts). Here's an animation of NASA EOSDIS Worldview satellite images showing what has happened during the past two weeks, ending yesterday (click for a slightly larger version):
And here's the animation with only the first and last images, two weeks apart:
Can you imagine that? It is almost possible to circumnavigate - love that word - Greenland with a sailboat! You can charter a sailboat in Iceland, sail past Cape Morris Jessup, Greenland's northernmost tip, and almost into the Lincoln Sea, through Nares Strait, down Baffin Bay, and be back in Reykjavík before the equinox. It's pretty crazy, when you think about it.
Still, it's difficult to say how unprecedented this is. Remember, a similar event took place a couple of months ago, which in a way was more spectacular, because it happened during winter. I wrote about it here, and Dr Lars Kaleschke posted this tweet, showing the retreat:
There is open water north of #Greenland where the thickest sea ice of the #Arctic used to be. It is not refreezing quickly because air temperatures are above zero confirmed by @dmidk's weather station #KapMorrisJesup. Wacky weather continues with scary strength and persistence. pic.twitter.com/YMnvCD8XvL
— Lars Kaleschke (@seaice_de) February 25, 2018
The cause of that event is the same as it is now: A high pressure area positioned in such a way, for an extended period of time, that the clockwise winds it engenders, pull away the ice from the North Greenland coast. But the big difference is that these winds were much, much stronger back in February than they are now. Another difference is that there was ice in Fram Strait blocking an open passage towards Cape Morris Jessup, but now the open water extends from Fram Strait to the Lincoln Sea. And last but not least, the ice quickly froze over again once the southerly winds died down. That will not happen here, not until September. If it closes again, it will be because northerly winds push the ice back towards the Greenland coast.
So, even though this massive retreat may not be unprecedented by itself (it might be, I'm not sure), what is most probably unprecedented, is that it takes a lot less extreme conditions for it to happen. Just one extended period of winds blowing north or northwest, et voilà, one can almost circumnavigate Greenland. It says something about the state of the ice. Remember, this zone is supposed to be the last refuge for thick(ish), multi-year sea ice.
Semi-jokingly or not, if Fram Strait and Nares Strait ever do get connected, I stand by my right to name the corridor Knopfler Strait. ;-)
-----
* This is the guy who hosts the Arctic Sea Ice Forum for me, and is indirectly responsible for the Arctic Sea Ice Graphs website. Thanks, Fred!
Forgot to mention: Professor Eli Rabett posted about this last week (check Zack Labe's Twitter animation). But over on the ASIF we have good eyes as well. We like carrots too.
Posted by: Neven | August 13, 2018 at 13:40
About Eli, I don't recall Neven writing that this melt season was boring at all, It may have been on the forum? At any rate, old on to your hats....
Posted by: wayne | August 14, 2018 at 06:26
So far my perceived difference between 2018 and 2012 season is the utter unfavorable weather conditions imposed on 2018, but there is a great deal of mixing, which at first glance appears as a melt slowing mechanism, but may very well be a almost imperceivable gradual destructive process,. 2012 had sudden drop in extent mainly by a strong cyclone mash up of already much melted sea ice having had more sun exposure, as opposed to 2018 which had no prolonged sun but intensive mixing mainly in the Pacific sector of the Pole:
http://eh2r.blogspot.com/2018/08/gradual-melt-will-eventually-show-up-as.html
We are seeing the final stages of perineal sea ice, whereas eventually it will be like Antarctica, seasonal winter events.
Posted by: wayne | August 15, 2018 at 04:58
I totally agree Wayne. This mixing the ice is going through is absolute hell on the integrity of already weakened ice. Many moons ago I called it TBLE ... The Belmont Lake Effect. Just to refresh a few memories this is how it got it's name:
"The Origin of TBLE: It was a mid-spring day and the ice on Belmont Lake was rotten but still covering the entire lake save for plenty of room along the shoreline for a row boat. Dad wanted to go fishing in the worst way. Well, to make a long story short, the wind kicked up, started to push the ice around and within 20 minutes we witnessed 2 miles of 6" thick rotten ice get smashed to oblivion. It was literally all gone when it piled up on the far end of the lake. Obviously the Arctic is just a wee bit larger than a several hundred acre lake ... but the PROCESS has to be the same. Mechanical destruction & dispersal after a major weakening, spells "doomed" in my estimation. Sure, the scale is different but both RC airplanes & jumbo jets fly because of the same principles. My 2¢ and I'm sticking to it."
It's only a matter of time now and I suspect the extent that will be lost is going to be astonishing. The fat lady may not be singing but she may be humming loud enough to hear. One month to go.
Posted by: John Bilsky | August 16, 2018 at 00:59
Hi John
Lakes are not at all bad place to study sea ice, your experience is fitting
and timely, I read NSIDC extent drop 130 K 2 days in a row, as well as JAXA increasing numbers, the latest 987 mb cyclone may be enough to finish off the remnant sea ice it is over, more quickly.....
Posted by: wayne | August 16, 2018 at 06:13
NSIDC 4 km resolution says so:
http://masie_web.apps.nsidc.org/pub/DATASETS/NOAA/G02186/plots/4km/r00_Northern_Hemisphere_ts_4km.png
Posted by: wayne | August 16, 2018 at 06:22
Great minds think alike Neven! Or should that be fools seldom differ?
Snow White is working on a similar article as we speak, albeit "her" title includes the word "Northabout".
Meanwhile Snow and I are pleased to be able to reveal that Great British physicist and oceanographer (and BBC TV star!) Helen Czerski recently reached the North Pole aboard the Swedish icebreaker Oden:
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2018/08/oden-reaches-the-north-pole-all-too-easily-once-again/
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 16, 2018 at 13:34
Thank you for sharing Jim!
One commenter is asking about the ice thickness and your entry also has the "reaches the north-pole all too easily" title, so I just wanted to comment as well.
As shown on the DMI ice thickness chart ( http://polarportal.dk/havis-og-isbjerge/havisens-tykkelse-og-volumen/ ), we have this year a narrow band of thin ice heading north to the west side of the pole from the Fram Strait. The Oden followed this narrow path of thin ice enabled by today's great ice charts. Any straight line course would result in heavy ice encounters, which may not have been possible for the Oden.
And was the ice really thin all the way to the pole?
As Helen commented:
"We kept going north, and yesterday morning, we woke up just 5.5 nautical miles from the North Pole, with very heavy ice between us and the pole. That’s apparently well within the official limits for having visited the pole, so the crew lowered the gangway and we were allowed out on the ice for the first time…..
We were standing on a metre-thick surface shell,.."
So clearly, while the ice is getting evermore fragile and an increasing number of stronger icebreakers cut the ice from spring/early summer when it cannot freeze up again, the navigation is getting easier overall, but it certainly helps that they have much better ice charts available today than in the past, so they do not get trapped and need assistance from more icebreakers.
Posted by: John Christensen | August 17, 2018 at 12:28
Thanks for your kind words John!
Helen also commented on August 11th:
https://twitter.com/helenczerski/status/1028386714203705344
We weren't really aiming for the pole, just to find a good ice floe as far north as possible. But we haven't found an ice floe yet and it looks as though I'll wake up tomorrow morning at the North Pole.
And please don't get me started on those DMI "thickness" maps! A certain Mr. "Goddard" is flashing those around with gay abandon at the moment, together with the resurfaced "submarine" meme:
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2018/08/uss-skate-at-the-north-pole-truth-and-fiction/
'Nuff said?
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 17, 2018 at 16:15
Hi Jim,
Fully agreed, I am in no way trying to compare with old days with any claims of ice conditions being similar. From the Fram voyage in the 1890's I recall reading that ice around the ship at times reached a thickness in excess of 30 feet and that in summer they could sail in the melt ponds, which were vast and deep, but did not leak due to the thickness and robustness of the ice during summer months also.
We are very far from that reality today..
All I wanted to say was that Oden wanted to sail as far north as possible and hook up with a floe there for research purposes and in fact stopped a few miles from the pole due to ice thickness, probably assessing that the effort to go the last miles was not worth the effort. A week ago Oden similarly made slow progress, as the sea ice was thicker than anticipated.
However, please do not side my comment with the fake stories that circulate in denier circles, as that was not at all my intent.
Posted by: John Christensen | August 17, 2018 at 18:00
Sorry John - I guess my bone dry Anglo Saxon humour partly passed you by? It was not my intent to place you in the (un)RealClimateScience box.
I was however intending to imply that I personally don't have a lot of faith in those particular DMI thickness maps.
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 17, 2018 at 20:59
Nice to read you back Jim
just on time for all kinds of complex sea ice happenings....
Posted by: wayne | August 18, 2018 at 01:16
" in summer they could sail in the melt ponds"
That, is scary. Very scary.
Posted by: EthonRaptor | August 18, 2018 at 16:55
It's certainly exciting times in the Northwest Passage at the moment Wayne! Did you by any chance spot Amundsen recently?
Rather later than last year, "Snow White's" detailed analysis of the Northwest Passage prospects for the small yachts endeavouring to sail (or more likely motor) through the Northwest Passage this summer:
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2018/08/the-northwest-passage-in-2018/
The central section between Bellot Strait and Gjoa Haven and/or Cambridge Bay is still chock a block.....
Meanwhile the Canadian icebreaker CCGS Amundsen has sailed past Arctic Bay and Resolute.
I cannot help but wonder what vessels might be closely following in his wake?
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 19, 2018 at 17:38
No problem Jim - just wanted to reconfirm in any case.
Posted by: John Christensen | August 20, 2018 at 10:57
"That, is scary. Very scary."
Hi Ethon,
I am not sure where you see the scary part about sailing in a melt pond on top of sea ice..
Posted by: John Christensen | August 20, 2018 at 11:02
Presumably Eli/Ethon was thinking of the contrast between how thick the ice must have been then and how thin it is now?
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 20, 2018 at 14:24
You are probably right Jim - these days we should probably be content with getting a paddle board floating in the ponds.. ;-)
Posted by: John Christensen | August 20, 2018 at 15:55
With a set of reasonably clear MODIS images in the bag "Snow White" is proud to present "her" own musings on assorted Arctic circumnavigations:
Could Northabout Circumnavigate Greenland in 2018?
If she put her mind to it could Northabout circumnavigate Greenland in 2018?
Here's another thought to ponder as well. I don't suppose it's in the Alfred Wegener Institute's PS115 mission plan, but do you suppose Polarstern could circumnavigate Greenland at the moment?
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 21, 2018 at 15:27
"Snow White" posted much the same story on Twitter, as a result of which she has attracted quite a lot of scientific "likes" and skeptical "foolishness".
Ruth Mottram commented on Neven's original article:
Hah, interesting!
Neven is pretty well spot on in his analysis here I think - one thing not picked up on and which reinforces view that winds are crucial is Kap Morris Jesup recorded a new record high temperature 3rd August of 17.4C in similar føhn wind.
"Snow" begged to differ!
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 21, 2018 at 23:35
Hi Jim
It was actually a cool summer:
http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_data/daily_data_e.html?StationID=53060&timeframe=2&StartYear=1840&EndYear=2018&Day=21&Year=2018&Month=7#
Even with that, the NW passage is opening up more than I anticipated, this is largely due to thinner accretion over past winter, not the "tropical" temperatures cited. SST's are equally very warm everywhere despite cooler temps about CAA.
How much winds will be a factor at this time of the year? Causing big waves for the rest of Central basin, I note the CB sea ice is beginning to be completely surrounded by water.
Posted by: wayne | August 22, 2018 at 02:53
Hi Wayne,
"It was actually a cool summer"
FYI "Snow" has been indulging in some idle banter with Judah Cohen on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/GreatWhiteCon/status/1031996075002003456
According to Judah:
I didn't realize that someone was running Andrew [Slater]'s sea ice model, I know that he was very proud of it and it looks like for good reason. I can see an early end to the sea ice melt season. The mostly positive AO seems to have helped retard sea ice melt this summer.
Posted by: Jim Hunt | August 22, 2018 at 13:33
Not quite so Jim
Is always good to have a different opinion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqfSWy3IRWY
Even from SKY news showing some sea ice specialists! I can only wish the Daily Fail would be likewise.....
No it is not going to be an early freeze up because, amongst other reasons, surface air temperatures have finally warmed over the Arctic Ocean!
Posted by: wayne | August 23, 2018 at 16:30
Once you expose a great deal of open water, especially on the Atlantic Front at 83 degrees North,,,,, what does that do to atmospheric circulations?
Posted by: wayne | August 23, 2018 at 16:35
Good to see that this event got reported, after all, on several news outlets.
Posted by: Neven | August 24, 2018 at 18:20
Does anyone have more information about the cyclone over Hudson Bay? Is it moving northwards? Any chances it could reach the Arctic basin?
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/weather/arcticweather_imagecontainer.php
https://weather.gc.ca/data/analysis/jac18_100.gif
Posted by: javimozo | August 24, 2018 at 20:05
"Any chances it could reach the Arctic basin?"
javimozo: It will reach the Arctic basin after a counter-clockwise circumnavigation of Greenland:
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=ecmwf®ion=nhem&pkg=z500_mslp&runtime=2018051800&fh=0
Posted by: John Christensen | August 24, 2018 at 22:09
"Good to see that this event got reported, after all, on several news outlets."
Indeed Neven
There is a lot of garbage talk about those who create fake news criticizing main media organizations as fake news. But the main media org's must focus more on real event stories affecting the entire planet, more emphasis on reality, for instance sending reporters where all this open water is, placating these images in the minds of billions of people, would in the long run, make a difference, as all good reporting usually does.
Has anyone seen yesterdays extent drop? A mere 45K when it looks like a whole lot more, sea ice present condition reminds me much like the worst melt years, our measuring techniques need some tweaking:
http://eh2r.blogspot.com/2018/08/slow-melt-rate-appears-on-verge-to-take.html
must remind often that we are dealing with a subject having very little ressources dedicated to it, the current effort in measuring and sharing visualizing the subject does not represent it's seriousness at all.
Posted by: wayne | August 25, 2018 at 10:32
The Ward Hunt Ice Shelf on Ellsemere Island has collapsed in last few days. See image on the Image of Day section of arctic Sea Ice
Forum.
Posted by: Russell McKane | August 25, 2018 at 14:45
Hi Russell
Ward Hunt (Island) was not only a huge Northern Hemisphere ice shelf, but the starting point to nearly all major expeditions to North Pole, further destruction was only a matter of time, especially exacerbated with this years coastal wide open water expanses...
Again JAXA map appears catastrophic:
http://eh2r.blogspot.com/2018/08/slow-bye-bye-of-east-siberian-ice.html
While extent numbers are not so dwindling quickly.
Posted by: wayne | August 26, 2018 at 08:59
In hindsight much to do about nothing on the larger scale and interested to find out why it happened on the microscale. The unusual NAO? Or winds or whatever? Good to find out why and how often it happens.
On the macroscale this year has been average for the 2010s or slightly higher up in the Antarctic.
More interestingly the Antarctic is still low since the flip in 2015. Nobody so far has explained this.
Finally. the last year had a very low Arctic maximum but average lowest extent in the summer. So we still cannot link winters to summers on one season.
What happened to all the melt ponds to help melt?
I still think there might be a bit of late season melt in this year.
Posted by: Zakelwe | September 05, 2018 at 00:31